Monday, January 30, 2012
Friday, January 27, 2012
Reading Reflection #1
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Chapter 1 Reading Reflection
I really enjoy the way that this chapter opens. It talks about how this guy names Scott is walking around his old school and questioning what he actually learned in each room. I once visited my high school and did the same thing. By reading this, I was able to connect that the classes I liked the most were because we had lots of hands-on projects that required a lot of time but were the most fun. I believe that if we aren’t having fun, we aren’t learning. Nobody wants to get knowledge shoved down their throat; learning should be a collaborative effort driven by curiosity and desire, not a good grade. This reading response, for example, is driven by a good grade. I’m writing this because I have to, not because I have any desire to read textbook examples of how project based learning is effective. I would much rather find out how they work by observing or participating in them in a classroom setting…but I digress…
One of the things that I found in this reading was on page 13. It’s called “Tour of the Blogosphere.” I went to the website about David Warlick’s two cents worth. I really liked what was on that website because it calls for the focus to be on less, not more. This means less per-pupil spending, less teaching time, and attention paid to grades. David wrote that these are the sorts of techniques that are being used in Finland’s educational system and that they’re working pretty well. I like this approach because it leaves learning up to the student. It provides the student with more opportunities to come up with his/her own ideas instead of being forced to assimilate those of the teacher/curriculum.
Something that I found to be quite sad was the example of the guy named Paul Curtis and how he tried so hard to use project-based learning in his classroom, but it didn’t quite work out and he had to relocate schools. Teaching, in my opinion, should be a profession where it is up to us to craft the minds of students. However, it seems that there are so many government regulations nowadays that teachers are not only being taught what to teach but how to teach it as well. The real-world application of learning is being lost between textbooks and standardized tests. Not cool, government.
One of the things that the book talks about on page 20 is about how project-based learning is an investment. It takes a lot of time and preparation to “set the stage,” as the book puts it, for success to be attained by students, but it’s worth it. Students/teachers share responsibilities and control. Instead of having a rigid student-teacher relationship, teachers become more of a guide and students become more human-they are no longer test-taking, worksheet-completing robots. I like this approach a lot and will be looking for ways to incorporate it into my curriculum.